Skip to main content

1. गौरव जैन बनाम भारत संघ ए० आई० आर० 1997 एस० सी० 3021 के वाद के तथ्य एवं निर्णय के बारे में लिखिए।

1. Gaurav Jain Vs. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 3021

 

Gaurav Jain                                ---------------- Petitioner

V/s.

Union of India                                       ----------------Respondent

 

Reference: AIR 1997 SC 3021

Subject: This case is based on the Human Rights and Article 21 of the Indian Constitution in which protection of the women sex workers and rehabilitation of their children have been directed by the Government.

 

Facts of the case:

1. Gaurav Jain, who is an advocate in the Supreme Court, filed a public interest litigation in the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India after reading an article under the title of The society does not give anything to the children of the women sex workers in India' published in 'India Today', a magazine.

2. Shri Gaurav Jain prayed before the Supreme Court that Central, and the States be directed to decide for the rehabilitation of children, below sixteen years of age, of the women who are involved in sex trade.

3. So that their life should not be spoiled, and they do not destroy their future by indulging in pimping, drugging, thieving etc.

4. Shri Jain requested the Court that the writ of mandamus be issued to prevent the immorality of the children.

5. An arrangement be made for separate schools, hostels, hospitals, training centers etc. for them.

6. According to Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, all human beings are equal by birth, and they are equal in dignity and rights.

7. As per Article 2 of this Declaration, all persons have got a right for the rights of their children and freedoms.

8. There are several Articles in the Universal Declaration of the Hu- man Rights to provide rights to such children.

9. Thus, not only Human Rights but Fundamental Rights of the children are also being openly infringed.

 

Supreme Court:

The Supreme Court held that it is the duty of the States and non-government organizations that they should find out the safeguards to pre- vent the women from indulging in such immoral profession and all out attempts should be made to prevent the children of the women's, who are already trapped in such profession, from joining the profession of their mothers and an arrangement should be made for their rehabilitation so that they be able to live with dignity which is a provision provided under Article 21 of the Constitution.

  1. -The Court has directed that they be provided the facility of education, they be provided job-oriented education and the articles manufactured by them be made available in the market.
  2. -If possible, their marriages be also arranged so that the problem of the child prostitutes be also solved.
  3. -The Court said that economic rehabilitation also plays an important role to relieve such women from the prostitution.
  4. -Non-government organizations can also play an effective role in this mission.

 

Judgment: The petition is disposed of accordingly.

Law laid down:

  1. -Human Rights are necessary for the dignity and honor of the physic of a human being.
  2. -The Human Resource and Welfare Department should take initiatives for the rehabilitation of the sex workers for their economic self-reliance.
  3. -A public interest litigation can be filed under Article 32 of the Constitution.

Textbook References : 
  1. Textbook on Human Rights Law and Practice by Rashee Jain
  2. International Law & Human Rights by Dr. H.O. Agarwal
  3. Human Rights by Michael Freeman
  4. International Human Rights Law by David Harris
  5. A philosophical Introduction to Human Rights by Thomas Mertens
  6. Human Rights Law by Howard Davis 
  7. Human Rights A Very Short Introduction by Andrew Clapham 


Comments

Followers

बासी खबर की ताजगी

मंत्रिपरिषद की बैठक , दिनांक 09 जुलाई 2024

छत्तीसगढ़ प्रदेश के  मुख्यमंत्री श्री विष्णु देव साय की अध्यक्षता में दिनांक 09 जुलाई 2024 को मंत्रालय महानदी भवन में मंत्रिपरिषद की बैठक आयोजित हुई। बैठक में निम्नानुसार महत्वपूर्ण निर्णय लिए गए - मंत्रिपरिषद की बैठक में निर्णय लिया गया कि राजस्व एवं आपदा प्रबंधन विभाग तथा वन और जलवायु परिवर्तन विभाग द्वारा वन अधिकार अधिनियम के तहत व्यक्तिगत्त वन अधिकार पत्रधारकों की मृत्यु होने पर वारिसानों के नाम पर काबिज वन भूमि का हस्तांतरण राजस्व या वन अभिलेखों में दर्ज करने संबंधित कार्यवाही के लिए प्रक्रिया प्रारूप का अनुमोदन किया गया। इससे भविष्य में नक्शा का जिओ रिफ्रेंसिंग होने से भूखण्ड का आधार नंबर भी लिया जाएगा। इसका उपयोग नामांतरण, सीमांकन, बटवारा आदि में किया जाएगा। प्रदेश में गुणवत्तापूर्ण शिक्षा व्यवस्था के लिए मंत्रिपरिषद की बैठक में भारत सरकार के शिक्षा मंत्रालय द्वारा जारी राष्ट्रीय शिक्षा नीति-2020 को छत्तीसगढ़ राज्य में पूर्ण रूप से लागू करने का निर्णय लिया गया। नई शिक्षा नीति के तहत कक्षा 5वीं तक बच्चों को स्थानीय भाषा-बोली में शिक्षा दिए जाने का प्रावधान किया गया है। इसके स...

विभागीय जाँच प्रक्रिया ०१

  विभागीय जाँच प्रक्रिया (Procedure of Department Inquiry) 1. विभागीय जाँच का प्रारम्भ- विभागीय जाँच हेतु जब कोई प्रकरण अनुशासनिक अधिकारी द्वारा तैयार किया जाता है। तब आरम्भिक स्थिति में तीन महत्वपूर्ण घटनाएँ घटित होता है. जो इस प्रकार है-  (1) आरोप पत्र तैयार किया जाना- विभागीय जाँच के प्रारंभ करने की जो प्रथम महत्वपूर्ण कार्यवाही है, वह अनुशासनिक अधिकारी द्वारा, जिस कदाचरण हेतु विभागीय जाँच का निर्णय लिया गया है. आरोप-पदों का तैयार किया जाना है। आरोप पत्र तैयार करना 'सी.जी.सी.एस.सी. सी.ए. नियम के अधीन एक आज्ञापक (Mandatory) कार्यवाही है। इस प्रकार सी.जी.सी.एस.सी.सी.ए. नियम के नियम 14 (3) में अपचारी अधिकारी को एक आरोप पत्र जारी करने का प्रावधान किया गया है, जिसमें मुख्यतया निम्न ब्यौरे होंगे-  (ⅰ) लगाए गए आरोप या आरोपों का विवरण( Discription of Charges ), (in) आरोपों पर अभिकथन ( Statement of Allegations ),  (ii) अभिलेखीय साक्ष्यों की सूची ( List of documentary evidence ),  (iv) साक्षियों की सूची ( List of witnesses )। (2) अपचारी अधिकारी को आरोप पत्र जारी किया ज...

Leading Case CG LRC

  1. Poonam Chand  (Plaintiff/ Appellant) Vs  State of M.P. (Defendant/ Responded) Sub: This case relates to Section 59 (2) of the MP Land Revenue Code, which has retrospective effect or not, has been decided herein. Facts of the case :- 1. The Plaintiff owned an agricultural land measuring 26 acre in the Khasra No. 649/3 at Tahsil Sausar in District Chhindwada of MP. 2. A house was built at this land by diverting a portion of that agricultural land into non agricultural land in the year 1928. 3. The MP Land Revenue Code came into effect from 2 Octo- ber, 1959 and this was clear that the diversion of the said land had already taken place before the MP Land Revenue Code having been operational. 4. Section 59A of the Code has a clear provision that when- ever an assessment is done under this Section, it will be done after this Code being effective. 5. The SDM, in whose jurisdiction the land was situated, had passed an order on 10-3-1964 for a rent of Rs. 63.64 instead of Rs...